Sabbath,
Sunday, Or…?
Bernie Koerselman
Print: A4 Size PDF Version Print: Letter Size PDF Version
Table of Contents
God’s
Command to New Testament Believers
Jesus Taught Healing (Helping) On the Sabbath
Jesus Admitted Working on the Sabbath
Sabbatarian
Arguments Defending Sabbath-Keeping
Sabbatarians Say Jesus is Author of Old Testament Law
Sabbatarians Say Jesus Said the Law Will Last
Sabbatarians Say Blessings and Curses Show Law In Effect
What
Did New Testament Writers Say (and Not Say)?
Critical Question: Is the
Old Testament Law Still In Effect?
God Canceled the Written Code, Nailing It To The Cross
Christians are Released From the Law
What Was the Purpose of the Law?
Could “The Law” Make Men Righteous Before God?
How Are Christians Made Righteous Before God?
Sabbatarians Claim No Real Change
No One Is Justified Before God By the Law
If Led By the Spirit, You Are Not Under Law
What About Those Who Insist on Following the Law?
Sabbath Rest as a Type of Rest in Jesus
To
Whom Was the Sabbath Command Given?
Is
the Sabbath a Creation Ordinance?
Paul’s
Teaching On Accepting One Another
Remain
In the Situation You Were
Paul
Regularly Went to the Synagogues
Paul Tried to Reach All Peoples By Being Like Them
Love
is the Fulfillment the Law of Christ
Sabbath-Keeping
As An Issue of Salvation
Continuing Activities/Sins That Will Deny Salvation
Circumcision
– A Parallel to Sabbath-Keeping
Sabbath-keeping Similar to Circumcision
Do
Sabbatarians Keep the Sabbath?
Is
the Seventh Day Sabbath the Only Sabbath Observed?
The
Early Church (from the Scriptures)
Beliefs and Practices of the Early Church
Dictionary of Early Christian Beliefs
Understanding the Early Church Quotations
Scriptures Cited by the Early Church Regarding the Sabbath
Most Early Christians Did Not Observe the Sabbath
Early Church Believed Jews Were Wrong
Christ’s Law Requires a Perpetual Sabbath
Before the Law Righteous Men Kept No Sabbath
Sunday
Was Established By Secular Order As the Christian Day Of Worship
III. Or . . . What Does
Scripture Say?
There seems to be great confusion over which commands of
God to obey. Paul said, “Keeping
God’s commands is what counts” (1 Corinthians 7:17).
The thrust of the Old and New Testaments is to be obedient to God’s
commands. The question is:
What are the commands of God that the New Testament believer is to keep
and obey? I first answered that
question in the article “Which Law Does the Christian Obey?” found on the
website www.bereanpublishers.co.nz
under the heading “Important Issues.”
Nevertheless, the specific issue of whether to worship on
the Sabbath (Saturday) or Sunday or some other day continues to arise so this
article will attempt to fully explore this issue.
As part of this discussion we will look at the tradition of
the early church. Unfortunately,
many look at this quite differently, each drawing their own conclusion.
Others point to the fact that it was first the Roman Emperor and then the
Roman Catholic Church that dictated (commanded) that Sunday be the official day
of worship and so claim it must be the wrong day because of the source of the
command.
As in all our writings our source is neither tradition nor
opinion. We simply seek to find
what God said in his word – the Bible. This
sometimes requires more than blindly following a given favorite translation.
Sometimes it is necessary to revert to the Greek or Hebrew texts to plumb
the depths of meaning. Or sometimes
it is revealing to check several different translations and see how different
Greek (or Hebrew) language experts chose to interpret the original texts.
But, above all, it is the word of God that must explain which commands we
are to follow.
Finally, as we examine the scriptural texts, let us keep in mind both the context and the persons to whom the passages were directed. Also, in this particular subject – the Sabbath – let us pay attention both to what is said and what is not said. If the Sabbath must be observed by Gentiles believers, then surely God will clearly specify that.
As Jesus was about to ascend into heaven, he gave his last
and most complete instruction to his followers about what they were to do after
he left them:
Matthew 28:18 “All
authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19
Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name
of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20
and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And
surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”
If we are to teach new believers to obey everything Jesus commanded, then we should first study his teachings and commands to see what Jesus had to say on the subject of the Sabbath.
At Matthew
12:8, Jesus said he was Lord of the Sabbath (see also Luke 6:5).
Many scriptures record the frequent confrontations Jesus had with the
religious rulers over Sabbath-keeping. Mark
1:21-28 records Jesus casting a demon from a man on the Sabbath.
Matthew 12 tells of the disciples eating the heads of grain as they went
through a field (see also Mark 2:22-23, Luke 6:1-2).
The Pharisees accused them of doing that which was unlawful on the
Sabbath. John 5:1-15 records the
healing of the invalid at the pool of Bethesda. The entire 9th chapter of the Gospel of John is
devoted to the story of a man born blind who was healed by Jesus on the Sabbath.
Matthew 12 tells of Jesus healing a man with a shriveled hand (see also
Mark 3:1-6, Luke 6:6-11). When the
Pharisees objected, Jesus said:
Matthew
12:11 “If any of you has a sheep and it falls into a pit on the Sabbath,
will you not take hold of it and lift it out? 12 How much more valuable is a man than a sheep!
Therefore it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath.”
Mark 2:27 “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. 28 So the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath.”
On a
Sabbath Jesus healed a woman bent over who could not straighten up.
The Pharisees were
indignant and told the people not to come for healing on the Sabbath.
But Jesus told them:
Luke
13:15 The Lord answered him, “You hypocrites! Doesn’t each of you on
the Sabbath untie his ox or donkey from the stall and lead it out to give it
water? 16 Then should
not this woman, a daughter of Abraham, whom Satan has kept bound for eighteen
long years, be set free on the Sabbath day from what bound her?”
When eating
at the house of a Pharisee on a Sabbath, Jesus saw a man suffering from dropsy
and asked the Pharisees what they thought of healing on the Sabbath.
Jesus healed the man and said:
Luke 14:5 Then he asked them, “If one of you has a son or an ox that falls into a well on the Sabbath day, will you not immediately pull him out?” 6 And they had nothing to say. (See also John 7:21-24).
Jesus Admitted Working on the Sabbath
At John
5:17 Jesus said a most significant thing about both God and Jesus working on
the Sabbath:
John
5:16 So, because Jesus was doing these things on the Sabbath, the Jews
persecuted him. 17 Jesus
said to them, “My Father is always at his work to this very day, and I,
too, am working.” 18 For
this reason the Jews tried all the harder to kill him; not only was he breaking
the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal
with God.
Jesus
admitted he was working – which was breaking the Sabbath rules and
regulations. But he also said his
Father – God – was also working and is always working.
Jesus went
to the synagogue and often taught in the synagogues on the Sabbath (Matthew
12:9, Mark 6:2, Luke 4:16, 31).
What have
we learned? Jesus apparently
respected the Sabbath and often went to the synagogue and taught there on the
Sabbath. But he constantly did on
the Sabbath that which the Jews considered unlawful.
He declared that the Sabbath was made for man, not the other way around,
and that he was Lord of the Sabbath. Finally,
he said that both he and his Father were constantly working – not keeping the
seventh day Sabbath.
What did
Jesus not do? He did NOT
command his followers to keep and observe the Sabbath as a day of rest and
worship.
Is it significant that Jesus did not specifically command observance of the Sabbath for his followers? It would seem very significant, as we are commanded to teach new disciples to obey what Jesus taught and commanded.
Sabbatarians
sometimes argue that Jesus’ command at Matthew 28:20, “teach them to obey
all that I commanded you,” includes the commands of the Old Testament because
Jesus is the “Word” (John 1:1) and therefore the author of the Old
Testament. This argument is without
merit for several reasons.
First,
Jesus was speaking to disciples who had been taught by him for 3 ½ years.
Never did Jesus refer to the Old Testament as something he had authored
and they were therefore to obey. The
only thing the disciples could relate to when Jesus said to teach new disciples
“to obey all that he had commanded them” was what Jesus had taught and
commanded them over the prior 3 ½ years. The
Gospel of John, revealing Jesus as the incarnate Word, was not written until
much later, perhaps 50-85 A.D. The
apostles and early church had no knowledge (from John’s writing) during all
those years of what Sabbatarians now claim.
Second,
John 1:1 says, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and
the Word was God.” The human
person of Jesus Christ – the only begotten Son of the Father – had not yet
come into existence. Yes, Jesus is
God – the Word – but he is also man, the son of Mary, born of a virgin,
without sin. The God-man, the Lord
Jesus Christ, is the one who commanded his followers to make new disciples and
to teach them “to obey all that he commanded them.”
Third,
Scripture says it was the Holy Spirit who prompted the writers:
20 Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet’s own interpretation. 21 For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.
Sabbatarians say that Jesus told us at Matthew 5:18 that
nothing whatsoever will disappear from the Law until heaven and earth disappear.
Let’s see what the Scripture says:
Matthew 5:18 I tell you
the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the
least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until
everything is accomplished.
Did Jesus say what the Sabbatarians claim?
No, not really. He said the Law would last indefinitely until everything
is accomplished! When would
everything be accomplished? When
the Law and the Prophets were fulfilled. What
did Jesus say he came to do?
Matthew 5:17 “Do not
think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to
abolish them but to fulfill them.
Jesus said he came to fulfill them. Did he? I believe he did, but what does Scripture say?
At Matthew 26:56, Jesus said, “56
But this has all taken place that the writings of the prophets might be
fulfilled.” When Jesus said,
“It is finished!” (John 19:30) on the cross, I believe he was stating
that the fulfillment of the law and the prophets was finished.
For corroboration, consider what Jesus said at Luke 18:31:
Jesus took the Twelve aside and told them,
“We are going up to Jerusalem,
and everything that is written by the prophets about the Son of
Man will be fulfilled.” (Luke 18:31).
This much misunderstood passage, claimed to say that the Old Testament Law will last until heaven and earth pass away, is indeed misstated and misunderstood. The law and prophets, according to Jesus, have been fulfilled and accomplished. IT IS FINISHED!
The Sabbatarians argue that Jesus, at Matthew 5:19, spoke
about those who break the commandments (Old Testament Law) and the blessings for
those who practice and teach them. But
is this so? The problem with this
passage may be partly punctuation (not in the Greek) and the way it is set forth
in the text of the various translations. Let’s look at Matthew 5:19-20 in the NIV:
Matthew 5:19 Anyone who
breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do
the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices
and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
20 For I tell you that
unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of
the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.
What was Jesus talking about in verses 19 and 20?
Notice that in verses 17 and 18 (see verses in previous section) Jesus is
talking generically about the law. There
are no specific commandments mentioned. But
in verse 19 he speaks of “these” commandments and “these
commands.” Jesus was teaching and
giving specific commands (Matthew 5:1-16) to the crowd of listeners and
continued to do so throughout the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5:19-7:27).
All of a sudden (at Matt. 5:18), it is though he turned aside to say he
has not come to abolish the law but to fulfill it and that nothing will
disappear from the law until everything is accomplished.
(Remember he said, “It is finished!”
All accomplished!)
Interpretation of verse 19 is easier to understand if we
realize that “these” commands referred to what Jesus was
speaking to the crowd, not referring back to an earlier statement about
the Law.
Consider the opposite interpretation – that Jesus was
referring to the Old Testament Law. If
that were so, what commands was Jesus saying we would be blessed if we practice
and teach them? Washing your hands?
Animal sacrifice? That
doesn’t make sense, does it?
Even stronger proof is found in verse 20.
The Pharisees kept the law to the jot and tittle (KJV) just as Paul said
he did as a Pharisee – he said he was blameless.
How could anyone have a righteousness that surpassed that of the
Pharisees and teachers of the law?
Jesus’ commands are of the heart and heart attitude (God looks at the heart). The external legalism of the Pharisees was a magnitude below the righteous behavior (of the heart) that Jesus taught. By following Jesus’ teachings and commands a person will indeed have a righteousness (of the heart) that surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law. Is it any wonder the Lord Jesus commanded that his commands be taught to all new disciples? (Matthew 28:20).
Please note that throughout this article “the law”
refers to the Old Testament law, NOT the teachings and commands of Jesus.
Paul continually faced opposition from those who tried to compel the
Gentile Christians to observe (obey) the Old Testament law – the Judaizers.
Jesus’ teachings and commands – Christ’s law –
are what all Christians are to obey (see Matthew 28:20).
Paul made the distinction between “Christ’s law” and “the law”
when writing the Corinthians:
1 Cor. 9:21 To those
not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I
am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law), so as
to win those not having the law.
Paul’s statement could be restated, “To those
Gentiles not under the Jewish law, I became as one not having the Jewish law
(though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law), so as to
win those not having the Jew’s law.
In 1 Corinthians 9:21, Paul equates “God’s law” with “Christ’s law.” Note that Paul has recognized that God’s law for the Christian church is the same as Christ’s law – the teachings and commands of Jesus, exactly what Jesus said we are to teach all disciples to obey (Matthew 28:20). Paul instructed the Galatians: “Carry each other’s burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ” (Galatians 6:2). Using “word of Christ,” Paul said, “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly as you teach and admonish one another with all wisdom, and as you sing psalms, hymns and spiritual songs with gratitude in your hearts to God (Colossians 3:16). The continuous emphasis of the New Testament is on what Jesus commanded, on what Jesus said!
Paul is the only New Testament writer to speak about the Sabbath. If Gentiles are required to follow the Sabbath practices of the Jews we should find strong admonitions to the Gentiles to keep and observe the Sabbath in the New Testament Scriptures.
This question is critical to our study and of utmost importance to Sabbatarians (Sabbath-Keepers). For Sabbatarians, the Old Testament Law must be still in force today because they know it is the ONLY authority they can point to for keeping the Sabbath. They have advanced many arguments over the ensuing years to show why Christians must keep the Sabbath including, for example, that the Sabbath is a creation ordinance and that Israel is now the church. We’ll examine each of their arguments to see whether they are founded in Scripture.
In the
clearest statement about observing the Sabbath, Paul told the Colossians:
Colossians 2:13 When you were dead in your sins and in the uncircumcision of your sinful nature, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all our sins, 14 having canceled the written code, with its regulations, that was against us and that stood opposed to us; he took it away, nailing it to the cross. 15 And having disarmed the powers and authorities, he made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross.
16 Therefore do not
let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious
festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. 17
These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however,
is found in Christ.
What did God do with the written code and its regulations?
He took it away! He nailed
it to the cross! Doesn’t that
seem transparently clear?
The problem is that Sabbatarians say the written code and
its regulations which were abolished – taken away, nailed to the cross – do
not apply to the ten commandments.
Let’s take a closer look at vs. 16.
The first part of the verse deals with the regulations pertaining to what
can be eaten or drunk. Next it applies to the religious festivals.
Finally it speaks specifically about the Sabbath.
Surely that must be the end of the matter.
It could hardly be more clear.
But no, again the Sabbatarians say this does not mean the 7th
day Sabbath. They say it refers to
the feasts that were special Sabbaths. Of
course the text doesn’t say special Sabbaths and the rule of interpretation of
Scripture should always be to accept the plain, literal, and clear meaning of
Scripture unless the context forces another interpretation.
Another writer advanced still a different idea, causing a
complete misunderstanding of Colossians 2:14.
His misunderstanding, from the King James Version, had to do with the
term “handwriting of ordinances that was against us.” The parallel in the NIV is “the written code, with its
regulations.”
Colossians 2:14 Blotting
out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary
to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross [KJV]
Colossians 2:14 having
canceled the written code, with its regulations, that was against us and
that stood opposed to us; he took it away, nailing it to the cross. [NIV]
The writer stated the “handwriting of ordinances”
literally means a list of judgments or offenses – a sentence of guilt rather
than a statement of the prevailing law.
I’m a lawyer. When
I read ordinance I read law. I’ve
always thought that is what it means. But
since I’m not new at being wrong, I immediately checked Webster’s dictionary
to see what that learned document had to say.
It defined ordinance as follows: 1(a):
an authoritative decree or direction:
Order; (b) regulation; 2: something
ordained or decreed by fate or a deity;
3: a prescribed usage,
practice, or ceremony.
Definitions 1 and 2 both fit all the laws and decrees of God, don’t they? The King James Version does bring up an interesting point. Why would it say “handwriting” of ordinances? Could that point directly to the Ten Commandments which were handwritten on stone by the finger of God? The NIV version is more likely the correct understanding – the written code vs. oral rules.
In Romans 7, Paul used the example of being bound in
marriage so long as the spouse is alive. But
when the spouse dies, the person is released from the law of marriage.
Using the example of a woman who marries again while the spouse is alive,
he says such a woman is called an adulteress.
However, if the husband dies, she is released from that law and is not an
adulteress even if she marries another man.
Paul says that is the example that is to apply to us – those who have died to the law through the body of Christ. He says, “But now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been released from the law so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit and not in the old way of the written code” (Romans 7:6).
Paul, in particular, was the writer who discussed the
question of the Jewish law and its applicability to the Christian.
He was in a unique position to do so having been a Pharisee who had been
taught by Gamaliel (Acts 22:3), an esteemed teacher of the law.
There seem to be many reasons for the law. At Romans 3:20, Paul said “through the law we become conscious of sin.” At Romans 5:20 he wrote the Romans, “The law was added so that the trespass might increase.” At Galatians 3:19 Paul asked, “What, then, was the purpose of the law? It was added because of transgressions until the Seed to whom the promise referred had come.” At Galatians 3:24 Paul summarized the purpose of the law: “So the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ that we might be justified by faith.”
Over and over, Paul answers this question.
It must have been a hot topic of conversation in the days of the early
church as the Judaizers tried to convince the new Christians to follow the
Jewish law as well as Jesus. Paul
did not mince words. He stated:
Romans 3:20 Therefore no
one will be declared righteous in his sight by observing the law;
rather, through the law we become conscious of sin.
Galatians 2:15 “We
who are Jews by birth and not ‘Gentile sinners’ 16 know that a man is not justified by observing the
law, but by faith in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith in Christ
Jesus that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by observing the law,
because by observing the law no one will be justified.
Galatians 3:11 Clearly no
one is justified before God by the law, because, “The righteous will live
by faith.”
But some still seem to rely on observing the law to be
regarded as righteous before God. This
seems to be true of Sabbatarians. Paul
crushed that notion when he told the Galatians:
Galatians 3:10 All
who rely on observing the law are under a curse, for it is written:
“Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book
of the Law.”
Unequivocally Paul has established that rather than being declared righteous in God’s eyes by observing the law (imperfectly), law-keepers are under a curse because they cannot keep the law perfectly and rely on their efforts to obtain favor with God.
Paul made this answer equally clear.
Over and over he established:
Galatians 3:13 Christ
redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is
written: “Cursed is everyone who is hung on a tree.” 14
He redeemed us in order that the blessing given to Abraham might come to
the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, so that by faith we might receive the
promise of the Spirit.
Romans 3:23 for all
have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 and are justified freely by his grace through the
redemption that came by Christ Jesus. . . . 28 For we maintain
that a man is justified by faith apart from observing the law.
Romans 5:1 Therefore,
since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through
our Lord Jesus Christ, 2 through
whom we have gained access by faith into this grace in which we now
stand.
Romans 5:9 Since we
have now been justified by his blood, how much more shall we be saved
from God’s wrath through him! 10 For if, when we were God’s enemies, we were reconciled
to him through the death of his Son, how much more, having been
reconciled, shall we be saved through his life! 11
Not only is this so, but we also rejoice in God through our Lord Jesus
Christ, through whom we have now received reconciliation.
The capstone, of the argument between seeking
righteousness through the law or being made righteous by God’s grace through
faith in Christ Jesus our Lord, is:
Galatians 2;21 I do
not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through
the law, Christ died for nothing!”
Is the law still valid as the Sabbatarians claim?
That is really the crux of the matter, the heart of the question.
If it is, we must observe the Sabbath.
If it is not, why not, and what is the biblical authority that says it is
not still valid? Paul explained:
Galatians 3:19 What,
then, was the purpose of the law? It
was added because of transgressions until the Seed to whom the promise
referred had come.
Galatians 3:19 asks the purpose of the law.
Paul answers saying the purpose of the law was temporary – because of
transgressions (moral failure which surely would be made known through the
“moral law”). How long would
there be purpose for the law? Paul said, “Until the Seed to whom the promise
referred had come.”
Who is the Seed? Paul
told us:
16 The promises were
spoken to Abraham and to his seed. The Scripture does not say “and to
seeds,” meaning many people, but “and to your seed,” meaning one
person, who is Christ.
Would Sabbatarians deny that the Ten Commandments were
part of the law? They often call
the Ten Commandments the moral law (even though the 4th commandment
has no moral context). Consider
what the following scripture describes:
2 Corinthians 3:6 He has made us competent
as ministers of a new covenant—not of the letter but of the
Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life. 7 Now
if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on
stone. . . .
We know the Ten Commands were given to Moses on tablets of
stone. No other law was engraved by
God on stone. The above scripture
must refer to the Ten Commandments. Paul
is speaking of it as the same Law that has passed away, but this time is
referring to is as “the ministry that brought death.”
It seems totally justified, then, to say that the Ten Commandments are
part of the “Law” to which Paul repeatedly refers. But as we have seen, and will see repeatedly, for the
follower of Christ the Law is gone – it was nailed to the cross.
Galatians 3:24 So the
law was put in charge to lead us to Christ that we might be justified by
faith. 25 Now that
faith has come, we are no longer under the supervision of the law.
Again Paul makes the point. There was a purpose to the law. It was to lead us to Christ, but now that faith has come we are no longer under the supervision of the law.
Sabbatarians sometimes make the argument there is no real
change between the Old Testament requirements and the New Testament.
Of course they recognize that Christ came as a man, as recorded in the
New Testament, but they claim him as the creator-God of Genesis and see his
presence throughout the Old Testament. It
is as part of that argument they claim that Jesus (as the Word of John 1:1)
authored the Old Testament and thus the commands we are to keep (of Matthew
28:20) include the Old Testament commandments.
Is that what Scripture says? Let’s take a closer look.
The Apostle John, who identified Jesus as God the Word, a
few verses later made clear the huge differences occasioned by the coming of
Jesus:
17 For the law
was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.
Contrary to the claim of the Sabbatarians, John was not
saying that grace and truth were always present in the Old Testament through
Jesus Christ who was then the Word. To
come up with such an interpretation would require torturing the text into saying
something it does not.
Not only did truth come through Jesus Christ, Jesus himself
is the truth. Jesus not only claims
to be the truth, but the ONLY way to the Father – the only way to be saved:
6 Jesus answered, “I
am the way and the truth and the life.
No one comes to the Father except through me.”
Jesus said “no one” can be saved except through him.
His coming marked a great change in God’s dealing with mankind.
Throughout the Old
Testament, God had prophesied that he would send the Christ (the Messiah) and
even gave the exact time at which he would come. Paul assured the Galatians:
But when the time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under law, 5 to redeem those under law, that we might receive the full rights of sons (Galatians 4:4).
Were those under law redeemed (or able to be redeemed) before the coming of Jesus as the Redeemer and Savior? No! Pre-Christ the world was held a prisoner of the law. Jesus came to set the prisoners free. (See Luke 4:18-19).
Paul taught the Romans:
21
But now a righteousness from God, apart from law, has been
made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify. 22
This righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all
who believe.
Contrary to
the claim of the Sabbatarians, the thrust of these passages is that this
righteousness from God, apart from law, had not been known before.
It was only “when the time had fully come” that God sent his
Son. “Now,” Paul says, a
righteousness from God, apart from law, has been made known.
All this occurred with the coming of Jesus.
Paul compared the people’s situation under the law
before Christ and the change after Jesus came:
Galatians 3:22 But the Scripture declares that
the whole world is a prisoner of sin, so that what was promised,
being given through faith in Jesus Christ, might be given to those who believe.
23 Before this faith came [pre-Christ Old Testament],
we were held prisoners by the law, locked up until faith should be revealed
[through Jesus in the New Testament]. 24
So the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ that we might be
justified by faith. 25 Now
that faith has come, we are no longer under the supervision of the law.
Notice how vast the changes proclaimed by Paul.
Pre-Christ the Jews were held prisoners by the law.
Then faith was revealed. Now
that faith has come, believers are no longer under the supervision of the law.
Does that sound like the same law and salvation running through both the
Old and New Testaments as claimed by the Sabbatarians?
No. The Old Testament looked
forward to the coming of Jesus Christ through hundreds of prophecies.
The law was symbolic of what Jesus would fulfill as the lamb who was
slain to bring redemption and atonement for the sins of mankind.
In his first scripture reading in the synagogue in
Nazareth, Jesus read:
Luke 4:18 “The Spirit of the Lord is on me,
because he has anointed me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners
and recovery of sight for the blind, to release the oppressed, 19
to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.”
When Jesus said, “Today this scripture is fulfilled
in your hearing,” (Luke 4:21) was he speaking of freedom for the Jews held
prisoner by the law (Galatians 3:23) and the whole world held prisoner by
sin? (Gal. 3:22). This is a
very reasonable possibility. And
true to that interpretation, now that faith in the Lord Jesus Christ has come,
we are no longer under supervision of the law – no longer prisoners of the
law.
The law and the prophets looked forward to Jesus. Then he was born and the angels proclaimed, “Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you. He is Christ the Lord!” (Luke 2:11).
The Sabbath, perhaps more than any other law of the Jews,
was extremely burdensome with many rules and regulations pertaining to its
observance. Consider Paul’s
admonition at Galatians 5:1:
It is for freedom that Christ
has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened
again by a yoke of slavery.
Considering the context of all he is telling the
Galatians, Paul says it is freedom from the requirements of the law that
Christ has set the Galatians (and us) free.
He calls it being burdened by a yoke of slavery.
Which command was the most burdensome, the most like a yoke of
slavery? It was Sabbath-keeping.
Paul’s description of being under law is more than
burdensome:
Galatians 3:23 Before
this faith came, we were held prisoners by the law, locked up until
faith should be revealed.
How long were they held prisoners? Until faith should be revealed! There was a time limit on the usefulness of the law.
Didn’t
the Old Testament law also justify by faith?
Not according to Scripture. Paul
said “The Scripture foresaw that God would justify the Gentiles by
faith” (Galatians 3:8). That was
a future event, not something for the Israelites of the Old Testament era.
Repeatedly
Paul tried to make sure the churches knew the great difference between the
period before Christ and after Christ Jesus had come. He told the Galatians:
Galatians
3:11 Clearly no one is justified before God by the law, because,
“The righteous will live by faith.” 12 The law is not based on faith; on the
contrary, “The man who does these things will live by them.”
Galatians
2:15 “We who are Jews by birth and not ‘Gentile sinners’ 16
know that a man is not justified by observing the law, but by faith
in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be
justified by faith in Christ and not by observing the law, because by
observing the law no one will be justified.
Romans
3:20 Therefore no one will be declared righteous in his sight by
observing the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of sin.
The Greek verb for justified is also translated “declared righteous” with the same meaning. It is necessary for us to be declared righteous before God for us to be saved. But no one will be declared righteous by observing the law. We can only be justified – declared righteous – by faith in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Over and over Paul repeats the message to the Galatians
that they must come out from under the law – that they are NOT under law.
This time he refers to the Spirit to make his point:
Galatians 5:16 So I
say, live by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the
sinful nature. 17 For
the sinful nature desires what is contrary to the Spirit, and the Spirit what is
contrary to the sinful nature. They are in conflict with each other, so that you
do not do what you want. 18 But
if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under
law.
Living by the law is living by externals.
The teaching of Jesus, corroborated by the New Testament writers, is that
God looks at the heart. He wants a
pure heart, one that seeks holiness and righteousness, not gratifying the
desires of the sinful nature. It is
those who live by the Spirit who will accomplish that.
But those who live by the Spirit, who are led by the Spirit are NOT
under law.
Is it possible to be a Christian and not live by the
Spirit? Paul spoke to the Romans
about that:
Romans 8:9 You,
however, are controlled not by the sinful nature but by the Spirit, if
the Spirit of God lives in you. And if anyone does not
have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Christ.
Salvation belongs only to those who have received and follow Jesus Christ as their Lord. It is those who pledge to obey Jesus as Lord who receive the Holy Spirit (see John 14:15-16. See also Acts 5:32). But if anyone does not have the Spirit, he does NOT belong to Christ Jesus our Lord and does not have salvation.
What about those who have chosen to follow the law over
grace, the law over faith, the law over the Spirit? Paul said:
Galatians 5:4 You who
are trying to be justified by law have been alienated from Christ; you have
fallen away from grace.
The Galatians were turning back to the law under the
influence of the Judaizers. Paul
was incredulous:
. Galatians 5:9 But now that you know God—or rather are
known by God—how is it that you are turning back to those weak and
miserable principles? Do you wish to be enslaved by them all over again?
10 You are observing special
days and months and seasons and years! 11 I fear for you, that somehow I have wasted my efforts
on you.
Paul was concerned that the Galatians may actually have
left the faith by following the law, that all his work with them may have been
in vain. Paul spoke about those who
rely on observing the law:
Galatians 3:10 All
who rely on observing the law are under a curse, for it is written:
“Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book
of the Law.”
We know that only one person was able to do everything
perfectly, to be without sin. That
person was the Lord Jesus. Everyone
else (those who rely on observing the law) – but who do not continue to do
everything (perfectly) – are cursed.
If such persons preach that following the law – in
addition to follow Jesus – is necessary for salvation, they come under
Scripture’s strongest curse. Paul
said of the Judaizers:
Galatians 1:8 But
even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one
we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned! 9
As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to
you a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be eternally condemned!
Paul’s Gospel was to receive a righteousness from God through faith in Jesus Christ. He repeatedly said that no one will be justified by following the law. Can the Sabbatarians deny that the Sabbath is part of “the law” – the most burdensome of all?
One argument the Sabbatarians make is that the items listed
in Colossians 2:16 are qualified in vs. 17 as “a shadow of the things that
were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ.” In a Seventh Day Adventist article titled “Which
‘Sabbath’ Did Paul Rule Out?,” speaking specifically about Colossians
2:16-17, the author claims that the Seventh Day Sabbath is not a shadow of the
coming reality found in Christ. But
there the author errs.
In looking at the fulfillment of the Sabbath in Christ, we
must determine what the Sabbath represented and was to be.
It represented a rest from labor and was to be a rest from labor.
Let’s look at what Jesus said about himself.
“Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will
give you rest. 29 Take
my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and
you will find rest for your souls. 30
For my yoke is easy and my burden is light” (Matthew 11:28).
How perfectly Jesus fulfilled the type of the Sabbath.
All our lives we struggle and work until we come to the Lord Jesus.
Then we enter into the Sabbath rest that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Let’s examine a corroboration for that interpretation.
Beginning at Hebrews 3:7, the author speaks about rest.
But is it a Sabbath rest in Christ that he speaks about?
At 4:3, the author states, “Now we who have believed enter that
rest.” Who is he referring to?
It is surely those who believe in Jesus as Lord – true Christians.
But, is it “the Sabbath rest” in Christ or some other kind of rest? The answer is found at Hebrews 4:9:
Hebrews 4:8
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken later
about another day. 9 There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the
people of God; 10 for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests
from his own work, just as God did from his. 11 Let us,
therefore, make every effort to enter that rest, so that no one will fall
by following their example of disobedience.
Putting Jesus’ teaching about himself as the source of rest together with the passage in Hebrews, we find that the Sabbath is indeed presented as a type of the rest which is found in Jesus for those who believe in him. Those who follow Jesus find rest for their souls. It is not the Sabbath that will give them rest. It is Jesus: “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest.”
Following is the Sabbath command, given to the Israelites
shortly after God delivered them from Egypt.
Note who God spoke to:
Exodus 20:8 “Remember
the Sabbath day by keeping it holy. 9 Six days you shall labor and do all your work,
10 but the seventh day is a Sabbath to the LORD your God. On it you
shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your
manservant or maidservant, nor your animals, nor the alien within your
gates. 11 For in six
days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them,
but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore
the LORD blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy.
Could “you” be referring to you and me, those of us who
are New Testament Christians, mostly Gentiles?
In Deuteronomy 5:12-14 the Sabbath command is repeated.
But following, in vs. 15, Moses makes clear to whom the command is
given and why:
15 Remember that you
were slaves in Egypt and that the LORD your God brought you out of
there with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm. Therefore the LORD your God has commanded you
to observe the Sabbath day (Deuteronomy 5:15).
This verse makes clear that it cannot refer to New
Testament Christians, at least not to those who are Gentiles.
Neither we nor our ancestors were slaves in Egypt.
Neither we nor our ancestors were brought out of Egypt by God’s mighty
hand and his outstretched arm.
Moses recites that God delivered the Jews (Israelites) from
Egypt. Then Moses continued with
“Therefore” – because of that – God has commanded the Israelites
to observe the Sabbath Day.
Notwithstanding the clarity of Deuteronomy 5:15,
Sabbatarians argue that Egypt is a type for the world and that God’s
deliverance from Egypt is a type of God’s deliverance from the world when we
became Christians. Therefore, they
say, we should also observe the Sabbath.
But the Sabbatarians fail to complete the typology.
If Egypt and God’s deliverance from Egypt is a type, then we must see
the Sabbath as a type as well. The
Sabbath Day is also a type – of the permanent, day-by-day rest found by those
who come to the Lord Jesus as the source of rest and believe in him.
Is there further corroboration that this is to pertain only
to the Jews, the descendants of the Israelites who were taken out of Egypt by
the hand of God? Jeremiah 17:19-27
is an exhortation by God (through Jeremiah) to the Jews to keep his
Sabbath holy. God concluded by
saying this:
27 But if you do
not obey me to keep the Sabbath day holy by not carrying any load as you
come through the gates of Jerusalem on the Sabbath day, then I will
kindle an unquenchable fire in the gates of Jerusalem that will consume her
fortresses.’”
Could this apply to Gentile Christians?
Almost certainly not unless we were living in Jerusalem.
God specifically applies this to the Jews and to their capital city.
Finally God called Israel back to Sabbath observance
through Ezekiel. Note once again
the emphasis God places on who is to observe the Sabbath.
It is the people of Israel (vs. 13), “them in the desert” (vs. 13,
15).
Ezekiel 20:13 ”‘Yet the people of
Israel rebelled against me in the desert. They did not follow my
decrees but rejected my laws—although the man who obeys them will live by
them—and they utterly desecrated my Sabbaths. So I said I would pour out my wrath on them and
destroy them in the desert. 14
But for the sake of my name I did what would keep it from being profaned
in the eyes of the nations in whose sight I had brought them out. 15
Also with uplifted hand I swore to them in the desert that I would
not bring them into the land I had given them — a land flowing
with milk and honey, most beautiful of all lands — 16
because they rejected my laws and did not follow my decrees and
desecrated my Sabbaths. For their
hearts were devoted to their idols. 17
Yet I looked on them with pity and did not destroy them or
put an end to them in the desert. 18
I said to their children in the desert, “Do not follow the
statutes of your fathers or keep their laws or defile yourselves
with their idols. 19 I
am the LORD your God; follow my decrees and be careful to keep my laws.
Perhaps the
most persuasive scriptures to me are those where God says to the Israelites that
the Sabbath is a sign between Israel and himself [God].
Both Moses and Ezekiel repeated God’s reason for giving them the
Sabbath – that Israel may know that God is the Lord, who makes Israel
holy.
Exodus 31:12 Then the
LORD said to Moses, 13 “Say
to the Israelites, ‘You must observe my Sabbaths. This will be a
sign between me and you for the generations to come, so you
may know that I am the LORD, who makes you holy.
Ezekiel 20:12 Also I gave them my
Sabbaths as a sign between us, so they would know that I the LORD
made them holy.
Exekiel 20:20 Keep my Sabbaths holy, that
they may be a sign between us. Then you will know that I am the LORD
your God.”
God is not suggesting nor commanding that the Sabbath be observed by all the world. The texts all specifically say who the command applies to: “Neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your manservant or maidservant, nor your animals, nor the alien within your gates.” Aliens outside the gates are not affected. Gentiles are not commanded to obey. No, only Israel, its people, and those under its control and within its gates. The Sabbath is a specific sign for Israel!
Sabbatarians also claim that the Sabbath Day is a creation
ordinance. Naturally this is
because of the language within the commandment: “For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth,
the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day.
Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy.”
This language refers back to Genesis 2:2-3.
Sabbatarians claim that this was an ordinance that was to
be followed from the creation of the world and is to be observed forever – a
creation ordinance.
Let’s look more closely.
In all of Genesis and all the personalities described in Genesis, there
was NO mention of the Sabbath (or a seventh day) as a day to keep specially for
any reason. Nor was there even
mention of a seventh day except as the seventh day of creation when God rested
(at Genesis 2:2-3). Suddenly, at
Exodus 16:23, when Moses gave God’s instructions for collecting manna, the
term Sabbath is used for the first time:
Exodus 16:23 He said
to them, “This is what the LORD commanded: ‘Tomorrow is to be a day of rest,
a holy Sabbath to the LORD . . . 26 Six days you are to gather
it, but on the seventh day, the Sabbath, there will not be any.”
Until explained in Exodus 16:26, there was not even an
explanation that the Sabbath was the seventh day. Nor was it then connected to creation or God resting on the
seventh day. It was only with the
giving of the ten commandments, first recorded at Exodus 20:3-17, that the
Sabbath connection was made to God as creator who rested on the seventh day.
The first the Israelites (or anyone else as best we know) knew of a
Sabbath was when Moses told them to gather twice the amount of manna because
“tomorrow is to be a day of rest, a holy Sabbath to the LORD.”
Just as there was no mention of a seventh day in all of
Genesis (except Gen. 2:2-3) nor in Exodus up to Exodus 16:26, nor the term
Sabbath until Exodus 16:23, there was no mention of “week” until Genesis
29:27, 28, and then speaking only of a “bridal week” without definition of
what that meant. Throughout Genesis
the concept of months and days were used, but never “week” defined as a
seven day period, only twice as a “bridal week.”
The notion that the Sabbath was a creation ordinance is pure conjecture with no evidence whatsoever from the Scripture.
Instead of a creation ordinance, God repeatedly said he gave Israel the Sabbaths “as a sign between us, so they would know that I the LORD made them holy” (Exodus 31:12, Ezekiel 20:12, 20), and “then you will know that I am the LORD your God” (Ezekiel 20:19), and to remember that you were slaves in Egypt and that the LORD your God brought you out of there with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm” (Deuteronomy 5:15).
Instead of a creation ordinance that should be followed by all peoples at all times, it is very clear from Scripture that the Sabbath was given to Israel and only to Israel and to apply only to those under the control of Israel, their sons and daughters, manservants and maidservants, and the aliens within its gates. Nowhere is the Sabbath applied to anyone else. God sought to set apart Israel for himself, a unique people, holy and separated to God.
Judaizers had come to the Galatians and insisted that, in
addition to following Jesus as Lord – the teaching that Paul had given them
– the Galatians were also to follow the rules and regulations of the Jews.
The Judaizers claimed the Gentiles were to have the flesh symbol of
circumcision and observe rules and regulations of the Jews.
What was Paul’s response?
He castigated them:
Galatians 4:9 But now
that you know God — or rather are known by God — how is it that you are turning
back to those weak and miserable principles? Do you wish to be enslaved by
them all over again? 10 You
are observing special days and months and seasons and years! 11
I fear for you, that somehow I have wasted my efforts on you.
“Special days and months and seasons and years!” sounds
very much like the warning Paul gave the Colossian church. Though he did not specify Sabbaths by name to the Galatians,
the parallel is similar to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a
Sabbath day, all specified in the warning to the Colossians.
Paul is making it very clear that the Galatian Christians are NOT to turn
back and be enslaved by such rules and regulations.
Paul came into conflict with Peter at Galatia because Peter
had pulled back from the Gentile Christians because of the Judaizers.
Paul’s response told us the Gospel and the place of the Jews’ rules,
regulations and commands for the Gentile Christian:
15 “We who are Jews
by birth and not ‘Gentile sinners’ 16 know that a man is not
justified by observing the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ.
So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be justified
by faith in Christ and not by observing the law, because by observing the law
no one will be justified.
This is a
strong response. And it is totally
contrary to the Jewish thinking of his day.
It is NOT by observing the law but through faith in Christ Jesus that we
can be justified. Then even more
strongly Paul states: “By
observing the law no one will be justified.”
How is it, with language that strong and unambiguous, that Sabbatarians continue to claim that it is essential to observe the Jewish Sabbath?
In Paul’s day, as today, many have different opinions of
what Scripture says or how they should honor God and obey his commands.
In Romans 14, Paul is admonishing the Romans to be accepting of those
whose faith is weak – those who eat only vegetables.
First he speaks of food but then at verse 5 he speaks of days:
Romans 14:5 One man considers one day more
sacred than another; another man considers every day alike. Each one should be
fully convinced in his own mind. 6
He who regards one day as special, does so to the Lord.
He who eats meat, eats to the Lord, for he gives thanks to God; and he
who abstains, does so to the Lord and gives thanks to God.
If the Sabbath were to be observed by the Gentile
believers, certainly this was the time for Paul to say so. Instead he speaks of one man who considers one day more
sacred than another; another man who considers every day alike.
Paul is totally neutral in his speech, neither praising nor condemning
either person. He says both are
acceptable to God. His point is
only that they should accept one another even though they think differently
because:
4 Who are you to judge someone else’s servant? To his own master he stands or falls. And he will stand, for the Lord is able to make him stand (Romans 14:4).
Paul taught the Corinthians that they were to retain the
place in life that the Lord assigned to them – that which they were in when
God called them (see 1 Corinthians 7:17-20).
Paul first uses the example of circumcision, that it is nothing and
uncircumcision is nothing. We’ve
seen in the previous passages that circumcision and following the other rules
and regulations of the law were almost always considered together.
Likely that would be true here as well.
God was not taken by surprise by the move of Christianity to the Gentiles. It was God who engineered it. While a whole nation of Jews could easily follow the Sabbath command (if they chose to do so), it would be much harder or impossible for the Gentiles to do the same.
Someone might be a slave to another and be required to work all seven days of each week. Would God cause his salvation to be nullified because he could not fulfill Sabbath worship and rest? It would appear that in his great and perfect foreknowledge, God knew fully the circumstances the Gentile believers would encounter. As a result, he nailed to the cross all the rules and regulations of the law. God replaced the Old Testament Law with the teachings and commands of his son, the Lord Jesus Christ, to whom he gave all authority in heaven and on earth.
Some Sabbatarians claim that because Paul went regularly to
the synagogue on the Sabbath that is proof of the practice of the early church
to meet, worship, and observe the Sabbath.
But is this so?
Why do you think Paul went to the synagogues? In virtually every case, wasn’t he there to present the Gospel first to the Jews, telling them about the Lord Jesus as their Messiah? Acts 17:2 records, “As his custom was, Paul went into the synagogue, and on three Sabbath days he reasoned with them from the Scriptures” and Acts 18:4 states, “Every Sabbath he reasoned in the synagogue, trying to persuade Jews and Greeks.” See also Acts 13;14, 42.
1 Cor. 9:21 To those
not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I am not free
from God’s law but am under Christ’s law), so as to win those not having the
law.
Paul’s statement could be restated, “To those
Gentiles not under the Jewish law, I became as one not having the Jewish law
(though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law), so as to
win those not having the Jew’s law.
Is it likely that Paul tried to win the Gentiles (not under the Law) but then carefully observed the Sabbath? He says not! He says he became like one not having the law.
Seventeen years after his conversion, Paul made a trip to
Jerusalem. He wanted to verify that
the message he was teaching the Gentiles was the correct message.
After a time of meeting with the leaders and fellowship with them, Paul
describes the conclusion of his visit:
Galatians 2;9 James,
Peter and John, those reputed to be pillars, gave me and Barnabas the right hand
of fellowship when they recognized the grace given to me. They agreed that we
should go to the Gentiles, and they to the Jews. 10
All they asked was that we should continue to remember the poor,
the very thing I was eager to do.
What did those leaders not do?
They did not instruct Paul to teach the Gentiles to carefully
observe the Sabbath. Surely, if
Sabbath-keeping were important and applicable to the Gentiles that would have
been the opportune time to remind Paul of that.
Later, because of the problems with the Judaizers who
sought to compel the Gentile believers to accept the commands, rules, and
regulations of the Old Testament, Paul and others sought guidance from the
church in Jerusalem. After hearing
from Paul and Barnabas how God was working among the Gentiles, the church elders
wrote the following letter to the Gentiles:
The apostles and elders, your brothers, to the Gentile believers in Antioch, Syria and Cilicia: Greetings.
24 We have heard that some went out from us without our
authorization and disturbed you, troubling your minds by what they said. 25
So we all agreed to choose some men and send them to you with our dear
friends Barnabas and Paul – 26 men who have risked their lives for
the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. 27
Therefore we are sending Judas and Silas to confirm by word of mouth what
we are writing. 28 It
seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to burden you with anything
beyond the following requirements: 29
You are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood,
from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality. You
will do well to avoid these things.
Farewell (Acts 15:23-29).
Again, if there were ever a time to command Sabbath worship
of the Gentiles, if that is what God intended, it would be from this church
council of the apostles and elders of the church, some of whom walked with Jesus
and were personally taught by him. Yet
the significant OMISSION of any reference whatsoever to Sabbath worship
shouts at us. It can only be
concluded that the apostles and elders recognized that the Old Testament
requirement of Sabbath worship did not apply to Christian believers.
Even further, when the council said “it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to burden you with anything beyond the following requirements,” they were doubtless referring to the rules and regulations of the Mosaic Law that the Judaizers had tried to impose on the Gentile Christians. Thus they established the rule that the Gentile Christians were not required to observe any of the rules and regulations of the Jewish Law except those items listed in verse 29 (see above).
The Holy Spirit reinforced that instruction by stating it
again. The setting was another
visit by Paul to Jerusalem. Note
what the Jerusalem Christians heard about Paul:
They have been informed that you
teach all the Jews who live among the Gentiles to turn away from Moses,
telling them not to circumcise their children or live according to our
customs (Acts 21:21).
Paul’s writings to the churches taught that the
Christians were no longer bound by the Old Testament Law.
In fact he had made extremely strong statements in his letter to the
Galatians against the Judaizers who attempted to add Old Testament Law to a
saving faith in the Lord Jesus.
The church leadership wanted Paul to be accepted in
Jerusalem among the Jews there. So
the leadership told Paul they had four men who had taken a vow.
They instructed Paul:
24“Take them and be
purified with them, and pay their expenses so that they may shave their
heads, and that all may know that those things of which they were informed
concerning you are nothing, but that you yourself also walk orderly and
keep the law” (Acts 21:24).
Significantly, the leadership again said, ““But concerning
the Gentiles who believe, we have written and decided that they
should observe no such thing, except that they should keep themselves
from things offered to idols, from blood, from things strangled, and from
sexual immorality” (Acts 21:25, NKJV).
What is the “no such thing” the Gentiles Christians should not have to observe? It could be the purification rites Paul and the four men were engaging in. But that would seem unlikely as those rites were for a specific purpose and would have no relevance to the Gentile Christians as a group. It likely was “the law”, the last two words of the preceding sentence. Note the similarity with “not to burden you with anything beyond the following requirements” the council had written to the Gentile Christians earlier (see Acts 15:28). Again the Holy Spirit emphasized that the Gentile Christians were free from the rules and regulations of the Law, including, of course, the requirement of Sabbath worship.
Paul described how the Christian is to fulfill the law (of
Christ):
Romans 13:8 Let no debt
remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for he
who loves his fellowman has fulfilled the law. 9 The commandments, “Do not commit adultery,” “Do
not murder,” “Do not steal,” “Do not covet,” and whatever other
commandment there may be, are summed up in this one rule: “Love your
neighbor as yourself.” 10
Love does no harm to its neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of
the law.
Notice the commands that Paul lists. They are all horizontal – man to man. The summary is that those who love their fellow man fulfill the law. Love is the fulfillment of the law. That certainly is not how the Jews viewed fulfillment of the Law of Moses.
Tragically, Sabbatarians have often stated Sabbath-keeping
as an issue of salvation. Often
they do not do it directly (at first), but first gain acceptance of the fact
that only those who are obedient will be saved.
Then they proceed with the argument that keeping the Sabbath is the
fourth commandment. How can we
expect to be saved if we do not keep it?
In a Seventh Day Adventist paper I received recently, the author stated: “Just before the Second Advent when the issues are clear to all, such denial of God will be evident in denial of the Sabbath, and will constitute the Mark of the Beast.” Gradually the stakes are raised so that failure to keep the Sabbath will be cause for irrevocable damnation (see Rev. 14:9-11).
Let’s go back to basics.
What are the continuing sins that Scripture says will prevent us from
being saved? Several passages
recite acts or ways of life that will prevent those who engage in those from
having eternal life. At 1
Corinthians 6:9, Paul states:
9 Do you not know that
the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God?
Do not be deceived: Neither
the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male
prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10 nor thieves
nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers
will inherit the kingdom of God.
In that list there was no mention of Sabbath-breakers.
Let’s look at another example as Paul warns the Galatians:
19 The acts of the
sinful nature are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery;
20 idolatry and witchcraft;
hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish
ambition, dissensions, factions