CHRISTIANS
AREN'T PERFECT,
JUST FORGIVEN
by
John H. Armstrong
Published
in ViewPoint, October‑December 1999, Volume 3, No. 4, pages 1, 9.
There it was,
just in front of me on the rear bumper of the car that had cut me off in
traffic! "Christians aren't perfect," said the slogan, "just
forgiven." It got me to
ruminating a bit, since my mind wanders in traffic jams.
What does this modern slogan really mean?
First, we
should remember just how profound slogans and short sayings can be. After all,
serious theological truths have often been reduced, helpfully or otherwise, to
slogans. Slogans such as "sola fide" and "sola Scriptura"
are both valuable and helpful. What bothered me that morning was what is behind
this particular slogan.
Now, within
all half truths, there are clear elements of truth.
This is certainly true with this saying. Christians plainly are not
perfect! Few of us ever claimed
that we were, though some, in recent centuries, have mistakenly spoken of
"entire perfection" in rather unhelpful ways.
Second,
Christians certainly are forgiven. Thanks
be to God for this reality If we were not forgiven, and by God Himself, there
would be no basis for us to call ourselves Christians, or to follow Christ in
faith and hope. Forgiven?
Yes, most assuredly.
But something
about this slogan still profoundly disturbs me. Are we not, in stating such a
theological truism, actually making a bold statement about our less than
biblical lifestyles? Are we not, if the truth be known, excusing our lack of
conformity to the holy law of God by referencing our detractors away from our
less than consistent lives to the grace and forgiveness of God? And are we not
denying the simple truth that Jesus said the world would (should) judge our
faith by actually scrutinizing our lives? Isn't this popular slogan, ultimately,
just another way by which we can talk about faith without obedience, faith
without works, or of a faith that is not the true gift of God? Let me explain.
True
Christians have a faith that works. Faith, variously defined and illustrated in
the Holy Scriptures, is ultimately confidence which is directed toward a future
in which God will be and do all that He has promised in divine revelation. The
very purpose of the gospel forgiveness is "to bring about the obedience of
faith..." (Rom. 1:5). Paul concludes his famous Roman epistle, which sets
forth forgiveness as a major theme, by reminding his readers that God did all of
this in order "to bring about the obedience of faith..." (Rom. 16:26).[1]
Surely here is
the missing note of almost all evangelical preaching in our time. We have
treated faith as assent, as decision, or as mere recognition. But faith, by
definition, is tantamount to obedience.
The whole
intent of the Mosaic Law in both the Pentateuch and Paul was to enjoin the kind
of obedience which is rooted in and flows out of true faith. This kind of
obedience excludes "boasting" precisely because we, as fallen
creatures, have nothing to offer to the Creator. Why? Because the Lord of heaven
and earth can not be "served by human hands, as though He Himself needed
anything, since He Himself gives to all mortals life and breath and all
things" (Acts 17:25).
But our
problem is that we live with the delusion that there is something, even though
it may be quite small, that we can offer to God that meets some need in God. If
we can meet a need then God will somehow be under obligation to show us favor.
This is why every religion in the world urges people to be like the Pharisees in
the temple, recounting their great accomplishments with the idea that such might
constitute service to a needy God.
No, God is
displeased with all the works in which men boast (cf. Psa. 50:7-13). The
God of the Bible stands ready to serve only those people who are: 1) thankful;
2) who honor Him by keeping their promises; and 3) who call upon Him for
deliverance in the day of trouble (Psa. 50: 14-15)
The problem
is that modern evangelicals have inherited massive theological presuppositions
from two schools of interpretation – dispensationalism and covenant theology.
In both systems, in various ways, it is taught that good works do accompany
genuine faith. In dispensationalism the emphasis is usually upon the distinctive
work of the Holy Spirit in this age. In covenant theology the emphasis is
usually upon the consequent necessity of a vital relationship between faith and
works. Both have missed the mark at a significant point.[2]
Consider that
Paul speaks twice to the Thessalonian church (cf. 1 Thess. 1:3; 2 Thess. 1:11)
of what he calls "the work of faith."
What is this? I answer,
succinctly, it is the same thing as "the obedience of faith" in both
Romans 1 and 16. My conclusion,
which would require scores of pages to unfold and demonstrate, is quite simple:
In biblical terms true faith is not merely accompanied by good works, as if they
may or may not be present, or may or may not somehow be part and parcel of true
faith. True faith is itself the very mainspring which produces obedience. You
can't speak of having faith without having "the work of faith" as
well. This was no less true under the older covenant than it is now under the
new. We do not have two Bibles. (In fact, the idea of an Old Testament within
the one Bible did not arise until the late second century).
The way of grace is the same under both administrations. Law and gospel
are not to be held in complete contrast. If we have true saving faith, it causes
us to lead a life of faithfulness, a life which works and obeys because of the
essence and nature of what faith is.
So what does
all of this theology have to do with the slogan I saw that morning?
Precisely this: We have so severed faith and works that we have created a
nightmare in the modern North American church. We have millions of people who
believe they are forgiven, have been told countless times that they are
forgiven, and who reason that since they are not perfect this is OK with God.
After all, what I do ultimately has nothing vital to contribute to what I
believe. Such people have no love for the law of God, no love for His
commandments. They believe the commandments are in contrast to the grace of God
so they need not be guided by them. They do not walk in obedience before God and
do not, accordingly persevere in true faith, which in its very essence is
faithfulness to the covenant. They are, consequently deluded. They walk about in
a spiritual stupor. And much of what the modern church teaches them – as
summed up in the modern slogan "Christians are not perfect, just
forgiven" – will ultimately lead to their being cut off in the final day.
Author: D. John H. Armstrong has been president of Reformation & Revival Ministries since 1991. He is the editor of both ViewPoint and Reformation & Revival Journal, a quarterly designed for church leadership. He is a frequent guest on many radio programs throughout North America, a speaker in dozens of conferences each year, and the author/editor of seven books. He has contributed to a number of other books and publications as well. He serves on the Committee on Evangelical Unity in the Gospel. John is married, the father of two adult children, and the grandfather of one. He makes his home in suburban Chicago.
Reformation and Revival Ministries, P.O. Box
88216, Carol Stream, Illinois 60188. Subscriptions
to ViewPoint in the U.S. are free upon request.
Because of postage, subscriptions to Canada are $3.00 annually.
All other foreign subscriptions are $6.00.
Footnotes
[1]
Don Kistler, ed., Trust and Obey: Obedience and the Christian
(Morgan, Pennsylvania: Soli Deo Gloria, 1996). In the chapter I contributed
to this volume titled, "The Obedience of Faith," I attempt to
show, in a popular exegetical manner, the implications of these two
important and vital texts in Romans.
[2]
Daniel P. Fuller, Gospel & Law: Contrast or Continuum? (Grand
Rapids :Eerdmans, 1980). This helpful out‑of‑print book opens up
this subject regarding these two popular systems of biblical interpretation.
I am indebted to Fuller’s cogent and powerful arguments.