Follow-up
on the
Daniel
Ekuchukwu Report
by David
Servant
So many people have asked questions regarding my report on the resurrection of
Nigerian pastor Daniel Ekechukwu that I thought I should write a follow-up.
Reactions have ranged from total unbelief to serious self-examination and
repentance. And because folks have forwarded the e-mail version or copied
the snail-mail version, I’ve received responses from far and wide. The
report has, for example, been posted on a web site in New Zealand and inquired
about in Finland. If you’ve forwarded my previous report to anyone, you
may want to forward this follow-up as well.
First, do I really believe that pastor Daniel Ekechukwu was dead for at least 42
hours? Yes, and for two reasons. First, because the evidence
strongly indicates that this miracle actually happened. It is documented
by means of many credible witnesses. It didn’t happen secretly; it
happened publicly. I personally interviewed two of the witnesses, Daniel
himself, and a friend of his, Ede Samuel, who was there when he died and when he
was resurrected. Daniel’s friend said he thought Daniel’s wife was
crazy thinking that her husband would come back to life.
Second, I believe the report because my theology makes room for the existence of
God. It amazes me that people who see and experience millions of
unexplainable miracles every day refuse to accept the fact that God performed
one more little miracle in Nigeria. When you can explain to me how your
fingernails grow or how the leaves change color in Fall, I’ll explain to you
how Daniel Ekechukwu was raised from the dead! It takes millions of
unexplainable miracles for you just to read this sentence. To religious
unbelievers, Paul asked, “Why is it considered incredible among you people if
God does raise the dead?” (Acts 26:8).
If one does not believe that Daniel Ekechukwu was raised from the dead, one must
then believe that he was unconscious for at least 42 hours, and that medical
personnel, a doctor, family members, pastors, church members, and an experienced
mortician were fooled into thinking he was dead because of the fact that he was
not breathing, had no heartbeat or pulse, had fixed pupils and rigor mortis!
One might just as well claim that Lazarus wasn’t dead, only unconscious, and
that he just happened to regain consciousness by the startling sound of Jesus’
voice as he lay in his tomb. If I had been there to examine Daniel
Ekechukwu, I would have thought he was dead, just like everyone else.
One “discernment ministry” attempts to discredit this miracle by quoting
Hebrews 9:27: “It is appointed for men to die once and after this comes
judgment.” Supposedly this verse proves that Daniel Ekechukwu could not
have been resurrected since the Bible says that people only die once. This
is a very weak argument indeed. A quick look at the context of
Hebrews 9:27 reveals that the inspired author was not declaring an unalterable
rule, but using a general truth as an analogy for Christ’s one-time sacrifice.
The passage actually says, “For inasmuch as it is appointed for men to die
once and after this comes judgment, so Christ also, having been offered
once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time for salvation...”
If Hebrews 9:27 invalidates Daniel Ekechukwu’s resurrection, then it also
invalidates the experiences of those whom Jesus, Peter and Paul raised from the
dead and who later died again.
Another “discernment ministry,” splitting hairs, points out that the rich
man’s request (recorded in Luke 16:27-28) was denied. This
supposedly exposes the lie of pastor Daniel’s claim that the angel told him
that the request of the rich man had been granted in Daniel’s resurrection.
May I point out that the rich man of Luke 16 specifically requested that Lazarus
be resurrected to warn his five brothers, but that request was denied
because Abraham knew they wouldn’t believe, since they, as
Jews, ignored the Law and Prophets all their lives. Abraham, however,
never promised that no other people in the future would rise from
the dead as a sign in an attempt to get other sinners (especially those who
never heard any Scripture) to repent of their sins. If Abraham was
promising that God would never resurrect anyone with the hope of leading
people to repentance, then we must deny the many later resurrections of which we
read in the Gospels and Acts, including even Jesus’ resurrection. The
angel’s statement to pastor Daniel Ekechukwu could be paraphrased, “Even
though the rich man’s request that Lazarus be sent to his five brothers was
denied several thousand years ago (and for good reason), now God is mercifully
going to grant even more than the rich man requested, and also for good reason.
You will be resurrected and testify before more than five people who will not
repent---you will speak to millions, and many who hear you will repent.”
So it is in that sense that God has granted the rich man’s request. And
God certainly has the prerogative to do that if He desires, even though some
“discernment minister” might object.
It has been asked, “How was it that Daniel’s body had no visible marks from
his accident when he came back to life?” I suppose that if God is able
to raise someone from the dead, He is also able to heal someone’s bruises,
cracked ribs, and damaged internal organs. In fact, if God did not heal
the people He resurrects, they would immediately die again of what originally
killed them.
Would not have Daniel’s body have bloated in the hot Nigerian climate during
those two days? another person asks. I don’t know what would have been
normal, but as I pointed out in my report, some Nigerians don’t bury their
dead for many weeks or even months after death as they gather money from
relatives for funerals. They must load those bodies with embalming
fluid. (When David Aboderin, my Nigerian friend whom I mentioned in my previous
report, lost his mother about a year ago, she was not buried for three months
after her death.) Not only was Daniel’s body partially injected with
embalming chemicals, but it seems obvious from the mortician’s testimony that
supernatural things were occurring to Daniel’s body even as it lay in the
morgue.
Some of the “discernment ministries” have attempted to discredit the entire
miracle because of its association with Reinhard Bonnke, whom they deem to be a
false teacher. Bonnke, however, is a man who has come close to death for his
faith in Christ, and risks his life every time he ministers in Africa, where
Muslims hate him. He was not permitted to minister in Nigeria for a number
of years because of Muslim rioting in the city of Kano, where many Christians
lost their lives and he almost lost his life just prior to a crusade there.
He proclaims a gospel that calls millions of people to repentance and faith in
Jesus Christ, and he prays for sick people, and numbers of them are healed
through their faith, a very biblical thing. The truth is, as I said in my
report, Reinhard Bonnke was nowhere near the church when Daniel Ekechukwu was
resurrected.
Many of the “discernment ministers,” although saying they believe that God
can heal someone or raise someone from the dead, could not tell you of a single
instance where they believe God has actually healed someone or raised someone
from the dead. Moreover, they do their best to discredit every report of a
healing or resurrection if it is associated with someone whose doctrine differs
from theirs. And while these “discernment ministers” spread their
judgments to their little constituencies of fellow unbelieving believers, people
like Reinhard Bonnke just keep preaching the gospel to the lost multitudes,
risking what no “discernment minister” would dare risk, as they safely tap
away on their keyboards in their kitchens and bedrooms.
What about the theological implications of Daniel’s experience in hell?
For example, isn’t the scene of people endlessly eating their own flesh
far-fetched? No, not really. God has repeatedly promised in His Word
that He will render to every person according to his deeds. Paul wrote:
But because of your stubbornness and unrepentant heart you are storing up
wrath for yourself in the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous
judgment of God, who will render to each person according to his deeds:
to those who by perseverance in doing good seek for glory and honor and
immortality, eternal life; but to those who are selfishly ambitious and do not
obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, wrath and indignation. There
will be tribulation and distress for every soul of man who does evil, of the
Jew first and also of the Greek, but glory and honor and peace to everyone who
does good, to the Jew first and also to the Greek (Rom. 2:5-10; emphasis
added).
The people whom Daniel saw endlessly eating their own flesh were apparently
being judged for eating human flesh as an occult practice during their lives.
In the Old Testament, God promised He would judge wicked people by leaving them
no alternative but to eat the flesh of their own dead children (see Deut.
28:54-57). As foretold in the New Testament book of Revelation, when God
will wrathfully turn the waters of the earth into blood, an angel will declare,
“Righteous are You, who are and who were, O Holy One, because You judged these
things; for they poured out the blood of saints and prophets, and You have
given them blood to drink. They deserve it” (Rev. 16:5-6).
God is not the big teddy bear that so many think He is.
Unless people repent, God is going to give them exactly what they deserve.
They will reap what they have sown, and thus Hell will be customized for every
sinner. Jesus warned of this: “And that slave who knew his master’s
will and did not get ready or act in accord with his will, will receive many
lashes, but the one who did not know it, and committed deeds worthy of a
flogging, will receive but few (Luke 12:47-48).
Certainly the one aspect of Daniel’s experience in hell that is the most
sobering was the angel’s declaration that Daniel would have ended up there
because of his unforgiveness (if God had not had mercy on him). Can
unforgiveness actually cause a Christian to end up in hell? Again,
Scripture answers Yes. Do you remember the parable of the
unforgiving servant found in Matthew 18:21-35? When the master learned
that his servant whom he had graciously forgiven had refused to forgive a fellow
servant, he was “moved with anger,” and “handed him over to the torturers
until he should repay all that was owed him” (Matt. 18:34). That is, the
servant’s formerly-forgiven and unpayable debt was reinstated, so that he
found himself once again owing what he could never repay, under the wrath of his
master and handed over to be tortured. Jesus then warned, “So shall My
heavenly Father do to you, if each of you does not forgive his brother from your
heart” (Matt. 18:35).
Clearly, this was a warning to Christians as proven by the external
context (see Matt. 18:1-2, 21; the parable was spoken to believers,
admonishing them to forgive their brothers), and by the internal context,
as the unforgiving servant obviously represents a person who was previously
forgiven by God, a Christian. But that forgiven person’s forgiven status
was annulled. He reaped what he had sown. Pastor Daniel Ekechukwu
was no different than the unforgiving servant in Jesus’ parable. So
why should we be surprised that an angel told Daniel Ekechukwu what Jesus has
told all of His followers?
All of this is to say that Christians can forfeit their salvation by
unforgiveness. If you are among those who believe that if you are once
saved you are guaranteed that you will always be saved, you need to re-think
your position. That view is not only disproved by the parable of the
unforgiving servant, but also by many other scriptures. (See Matt. 24:4-5,
11-13, 23-26, 42-51; 25:1-30; Luke 8:11-15; 11:24-28; 12:42-46; John 6:66-71;
8:31-32, 51; 15:1-6; Acts 11:21-23; 14:21-22; Rom. 6:11-23; 8:12-14, 17;
11:20-22; 1 Cor. 9:23-27; 10:1-21; 11:29-32; 15:1-2; 2 Cor. 1:24; 11:2-4;
12:21-13:5; Gal. 5:1-4; 6:7-9; Phil. 2:12-16; 3:17-4:1; Col. 1:21-23; 2:4-8,
18-19; 1 Thes. 3:1-8; 1 Tim. 1:3-7, 18-20; 4:1-16; 5:5-6, 11-15, 6:9-12, 17-19,
20-21; 2 Tim. 2:11-18; 3:13-15; Heb. 2:1-3; 3:6-19; 4:1-16: 5:8-9; 6:4-9, 10-20;
10:19-39; 12:1-17, 25-29; Jas. 1:12-16; 4:4-10; 5:19-20; 2 Pet. 1:5-11; 2:1-22;
3:16-17; 1 John 2:15-2:28; 5:16; 2 John 6-9; Jude 20-21; Rev. 2:7, 10-11, 17-26;
3:4-5, 8-12, 14-22; 21:7-8; 22:18-19.).
Jesus solemnly warned that if we don’t forgive others, God will not forgive
us. This is so vital that we should examine ourselves in this regard at
least as much as every time we pray according to Jesus:
Whenever you stand praying, forgive, if you have anything against
anyone, so that your Father who is in heaven will also forgive you your
transgressions. But if you do not forgive, neither will your Father who is in
heaven forgive your transgressions (Mark 11:25-26; emphasis added).
This is so fundamental that the concept is included in the Lord’s
Prayer:
‘And forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our
debtors’....”For if you forgive others for their transgressions,
your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not
forgive others, then your Father will not forgive your transgressions (Matt.
6:12-15; emphasis added).
Keep in mind that God does not expect us to do what He himself does not
do, that is, forgive people who don’t humble themselves and request our
forgiveness. If a brother sins against us, Jesus didn’t say we should forgive
him; He said we should confront him. And if he refuses to
listen to us, Jesus didn’t say we should forgive him. Rather, we
should bring two or three with us and confront him again. And if he
refuses to listen to those two or three, he should not be forgiven but be
confronted before the church. And if he refuses to listen to the
church, he should not be forgiven but be excommunicated and
treated like an unbeliever. Thus we can confidently say that there are
some people whom God does not want us to forgive. Significantly, these
steps of reconciliation and discipline I have just mentioned are found in
Matthew 18:15-17, just prior to the parable of the unforgiving servant.
These two passages certainly should not be interpreted so as to contradict one
another.
Forgiveness in its purest form can only be given when it is requested.
Jesus said, “If your brother sins, rebuke him; and if he repents,
forgive him. “And if he sins against you seven times a day, and returns to you
seven times, saying, ‘I repent,’ forgive him” (Luke 17:3-4;
emphasis added). In the parable of the unforgiving servant mentioned
earlier, note that both first and second servants requested mercy.
In pastor Daniel’s case, his wife had sought for reconciliation, Daniel had
refused her, and then he experienced his ill-timed death. Thank God that
He had mercy on Daniel, and in so doing, God has shown His mercy to all of us
who are not ready to stand before Him because of unforgiveness in our hearts.
Clearly, it is a very great evil in God’s eyes to refuse to forgive a brother
or sister in Christ who requests our forgiveness. It is also an evil to
not confront a brother or sister who sins against us and harbor ill-will against
him or her. This is, however, commonly practiced by those of us who name
Jesus as Lord. When offended, we don’t confront the offender.
Rather, we harbor a grudge and tell everyone of the offense, gossiping, adding
sin to our sin, and placing ourselves in the danger of being judged by God (see
Matt. 7:1-5). Jesus warned us that if our relationship with our brother is
not right, our relationship with God is not right either:
Therefore if you are presenting your offering at the altar, and there remember
that your brother has something against you, leave your offering there before
the altar and go; first be reconciled to your brother, and then come and
present your offering (Matt. 5:23-24).
If we realize that we have offended a brother, we should stop what we are doing,
even if we are performing some spiritual obligation, and go to that brother to
work towards reconciliation, just as Jesus taught.
Thus, both the offender (if he realizes what he has done) and the offended have
responsibility before God to make no delay in working for reconciliation.
And if they can’t reach reconciliation, they should seek the help of others
until reconciliation is reached or until one party is excommunicated from the
church, according to Christ’s instructions in Matthew 18:15-17.
Obviously, this is serious stuff to God.
With unbelievers and false believers, of course, it is not the same. We
can attempt to confront those who offend us, but we have very little recourse if
they refuse to be reconciled.
As our general rule, we should imitate God, who longs for sinners to turn from
their sins and be reconciled to Him, and so He always is working towards
reconciliation, patiently waiting for sinners to repent. We, too, should
maintain an “open-heart” policy, always doing what we can to be at peace
with others. In this regard, Paul wrote, “If possible, so far as it
depends on you, be at peace with all men” (Rom. 12:18). Both Jesus and
Stephen prayed for God to forgive the very people who were killing them.
We, too, have the same capacity to love by the power of the Holy Spirit.
Pastor Daniel Ekechukwu is now calling Christians to do what Christ has been
commanding all His followers to do for two thousand years: forgive one another.
And he is doing it with the passion of a man who really believes that Jesus
meant what He said. What if the whole thing is a hoax? Then the
worst thing that will come out of it is that hundreds of thousands, and perhaps
millions, of Christians will examine their lives and obey Jesus’ commandments
regarding forgiveness. Thus they will be more ready to meet Him when He comes.
That isn’t so bad, is it? And even if we ignore everything that
Daniel Ekechukwu says, we would be wise to not ignore anything Jesus said.
He had a lot to say about the absolute necessity of forgiveness and the dire
consequences of unforgiveness.
If you address as Father the One who impartially judges according to each
one’s work, conduct yourselves in fear during the time of your stay on earth;
knowing that you were not redeemed with perishable things like silver or gold
from your futile way of life inherited from your forefathers, but with precious
blood, as of a lamb unblemished and spotless, the blood of Christ (1 Pet.
1:17-19, emphasis added).