A Deposit Guaranteeing
Our Inheritance
By
Bernie
Koerselman
Download PDF File Download MS Word File
Table of Contents
Three Uses In the New Testament
“Guaranteeing Our Inheritance” is NOT In the Original Greek
Original Text is God-Breathed – Inspired by the Holy Spirit
The Literal Translation of Those Verses
Holy Spirit’s Presence and Sealing Explained
“Earnest” and “Deposit” Compared
Something of Value to Bind a Bargain
Application of Earnest Money Rules to Salvation
Examples of Failures to Keep Our Bargain With God
All the Other Conditions Of a Saving Faith
When Does God Demand Return Of His Ernest – the Holy Spirit?
The
title phrase, “a deposit, guaranteeing our inheritance,” is a phrase relied
upon by those seeking assurance of their salvation.
It is frequently offered as a proof of the doctrine of eternal security.
Because
of its use, and because of the doctrine for which it is offered as proof, it is
important to determine if the phrase is correctly quoted and if it means what
its proponents claim that it means. If
it is incorrectly quoted, or if the phrase does not mean what it says, it could
cut the ground from under those making false claims for false doctrines.
Three
times the phrase is used in the NIV version of the New Testament.
Let’s look at the entire verses to give the immediate context:
He anointed us, 22 set
his seal of ownership on us, and put his Spirit in our hearts as a deposit, guaranteeing
what is to come (2 Cor. 1:22).
5
Now it is God
who has made us for this very purpose and has given us the Spirit as a deposit, guaranteeing
what is to come (2 Cor. 5:5).
Having believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy
Spirit, 14 who is a
deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who
are God’s possession—to the praise of his glory (Ephesians 1:14).
All
three instances in the NIV speak of the Holy Spirit put in our hearts or given
us or the promised one who is a deposit guaranteeing what is to come or our
inheritance..
In
each case, as we can see, the phrase “guaranteeing what is to come” or
“guaranteeing our inheritance” explains the purpose of the deposit. It is important to our understanding of the phrase, as it
gives us the understanding of deposit.
But
suppose neither of those phrases are in the original text? They are NOT! The
translators decided to add the phrase, apparently believing that was what the
“meaning” of the text should be.
As a result, countless people have relied on these texts, believing that
was what Scripture says, while in fact it says something quite different, with
quite a different meaning, as we shall see.
What
is particularly amazing to me is that Ephesians 1:14 has no note whatsoever so
say that “guaranteeing our inheritance” was added and is not part of the
original text. My NIV study Bible
does say so with respect to 2 Cor. 1:22. As
to 2 Cor. 5:5, it only refers to the note on 1:22 as to the term deposit,
without reference to the addition of “guaranteeing our inheritance.
The
Preface to the Revised Edition of Young’s Literal Translation of the Holy
Bible (YLT) speaks to the kind of issue we face here:
The following Translation of the New Testament is based upon the belief that every word of the original is “God-breathed,” as the Apostle Paul says in his Second Epistle to Timothy, chapter 3.16. . . . This inspiration extends only to the original text, as it came from the pens of the writers, not to any translations ever made by man, however aged, venerable, or good; and only in so far as any of these adhere to the original – neither adding to nor omitting from it one particle – are they of any real value, for, to the extent that they vary from the original, the doctrine of verbal inspiration is lost, so far as that version is concerned.
Here
we have a case of a whole phrase being added by the translators.
. . . and He who is confirming you with us into Christ, and did anoint
us, is God, who also sealed us, and gave the earnest of the Spirit in our
hearts (2 Cor. 1:21-22, YLT).
And He who did work us to this self-same thing is God, who also did give
to us the earnest of the Spirit; (2 Cor. 5:5, YLT).
. . . in whom also having believed, ye were sealed, with the Holy Spirit
of the promise, which is an earnest of our inheritance, to the redemption
of the acquired possession, to the praise of His glory (Ephesians 1:13-14, YLT).
Something
else becomes obvious. The word
“deposit” is nowhere to be found. There
was another substitution of words by the translators. The original said it was the “earnest,” not a deposit.
We
didn’t have to go as far as Young’s Literal Translation of the Bible to
determine this. The King James
Version says the same thing.
People
have speculated on what sealing means. It
is explained in the text. In the
literal translation we find the explanation of the sealing of the Holy Spirit.
It is “an earnest of our inheritance.”
Is that the same thing as a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance?
Let’s compare deposit and earnest.
What
is “an earnest”? A 1976 edition
of Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary gives us an idea of what that means:
1. something of value given by a buyer to a seller to bind a bargain.
2. a token of what is to come.
A
deposit is defined as:
2. something placed for safekeeping: as a: money deposited in a bank b: money given as a pledge or down payment 3: a place of deposit 4: an act of depositing
Did
you notice something missing? Neither
definition has the word “guarantee” associated with it as part of its
meaning, yet that is an integral part of the phrase inserted by the translators.
Further,
the definitions have only one meaning in common – a down payment (or something
of value) given as a down payment (or to bind a bargain).
The word deposit misses altogether the significant meaning of
“earnest” as “a token of what is to come.”
Let’s
examine each of the two meanings possible in these scriptures.
Token
means (1) an outward sign or expression, (2) a symbol (as a white flag is a
token of surrender), (3) a distinguishing feature, (4) (a) souvenir or keepsake,
(b) a small part representing the whole (this is only a token of what he hopes
to accomplish), (c) something given or shown as a guarantee (as of authority,
right, or identity).
From
that definition, we have these possible meanings: an outward sign or expression
of what is to come, a symbol of what is to come, a distinguishing feature of
what is to come, or a small part representing the whole of what is to come.
Though 4(c) uses the word guarantee, it has no application here as it is
not the guarantee of what is to come, but rather the
guarantee of the authority, right, or identity of whoever gave the token.
In
the verses, the earnest is the Holy Spirit.
Consider Ephesians 1:14,
“sealed, with the Holy Spirit of the promise, which is an earnest
of
our inheritance, to the redemption of the acquired possession” (YLT).
Using
the definition of token as “a small part representing the whole,” consider
this rephrasing: “sealed with the
promised Holy Spirit, which is a token of our inheritance, to [until?] the
redemption of the acquired possession.” This
is a possible and reasonable interpretation.
When we are sealed with the Holy Spirit we then receive the fruit of the
Holy Spirit -- love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control (Galatians 5:22-23). Surely those manifestations
of the Spirit are a token – a small part representing the whole (of the
quality of life we will have for all eternity with Christ Jesus our Lord).
According to this meaning of token, we are given a token – a small
portion of like kind – of the characteristics of our inheritance in the
kingdom of God.
But
when we consider 2 Cor 1:22 and 5:5, we see slightly different language:
“gave the earnest of the Spirit” and “did give to us the
earnest of the Spirit”
Here
we see that the token is of the Spirit. Is
this still a small part representing the whole, as in the prior discussion?
It could well be the same. When
the believer is indwelled by the Holy Spirit, we know he does not have all of
the Holy Spirit within him. The
Holy Spirit is everywhere, indwelling all believers.
It could well mean that we have the token (a small part [of the Holy
Spirit] representing the whole).
Significantly,
neither application of the definition, nor others which could be considered but
seem far less applicable, guarantee anything.
Rather they both represent the result or the presence of God in the life
of the believer.
Let’s
look next at a common meaning of both earnest and deposit – something of value
to bind a transaction. It is common
to call money given by one person to another to bind a transaction “earnest
money.” It is good faith money,
given to show serious intent to complete the transaction.
Is
there any guarantee associated with earnest money?
As an attorney, I know of none. In
commercial transactions, the contract generally provides that if the party who
paid the earnest money defaults, he will lose the earnest money.
That is why it is called earnest money.
The person has to be in earnest because he knows he will lose the earnest
money paid if he fails to complete his part of the transaction.
Earnest
money has no way, in itself, of guaranteeing a transaction.
The ability of the person who paid the earnest money to complete the
transaction may change such that he cannot fulfill the agreement.
He may simply change his mind and be willing to forfeit the earnest money
rather than complete the transaction.
There
is also a way in which the earnest money could be returned to the buyer (who
paid the earnest money). If it is
later determined that the agreement was made fraudulently – due to the fraud
of the person receiving the earnest money, or due to mutual mistake, then the earnest money can be ordered
returned and the agreement voided. If
the recipient of the earnest money fails to complete his end of the bargain,
then also the earnest money must be returned.
There
is NO GUARANTEE associated with either earnest money or a deposit.
Both are either forfeitable or returnable, depending on the
circumstances.
This
discussion began about those people who have mistakenly used the above verses to
argue that salvation, once had – once the Holy Spirit was given as a deposit
– is guaranteed and cannot be lost.
We
have seen that the normal usage of both earnest money and deposit have no
application with a “guarantee,” but instead allows for both return and
forfeiture of the earnest money. And
that is the message of Scripture both by its teaching and examples given.
One
of the rules we saw above is that if the person receiving the earnest money
fails to complete his part of the bargain, the deposit (earnest money) is
refundable. If God sees that you or
I fail to keep our part of the bargain, he has every right to demand (and take
back) his earnest of the Holy Spirit.
Let’s
look at some of these parts of the bargain with God that a person may fail to
keep. If you don’t realize there
is a bargain that takes place, you will have difficulty understanding this
explanation.
The
bargain is simple. God says, “If
you believe (and continue to believe) in my Son, I will give you eternal
life.” (John 3:16).
The
response of those who will be saved is, “Yes, Father, I do believe in your
Son, the Lord Jesus Christ, and I will continue to believe in him.”
At
the point, there may be many who cry “Heresy!”
How can I say that we make a bargain with God about salvation?
They may say, salvation is all about grace!
But they are wrong! Salvation
is possible because of God’s grace – Jesus’ atoning death on the cross
means we can be justified before God – forgiven our sins and counted blameless
and free from accusation (Colossians 1:21-22), but it is enabled by our faith. I
define a saving faith as:
A saving faith is faith in Christ Jesus as our LORD, which is proved by our obedience to his teachings and commands, by the evidence of the fruit of the Spirit in our lives, and by doing those works God prepared in advance for us to do.
Scripture
requires those who would be saved to receive Jesus as their Lord
(see Romans 10:9-10, 13, 14:9; Acts 16:31,
Acts 20:21; 2 Corinthians 4:5; 1 Peter 3:15; Colossians 2:6-7; Acts 10:36, 5:14,
9:42, 11:21, 16:15, 18:8).
Obedience to Jesus’ teachings and commands is the natural and
necessary evidence of our love for Jesus as we receive him as our Lord (see Matthew 7:21, Romans 1:5, 16:26, 1 John 5:3,
Luke 6:46, John 14:15, 21, 23, Hebrews 5:9, and Matthew 28:20).[1]
If
Jesus is no longer our Lord, if we take control of our own lives and rebel
against him, we have breached the primary condition of our bargain with God.
His bargain of salvation is only for those who continue to live with
Jesus as their Lord.
Let’s
look at other potential breaches of our bargain with God:
Jesus,
warning about the conditions at the end of the age, said:
12
”Because
of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold, 13 but he who stands firm to the end will be saved”
(Matthew 24:12-13).
What
will happen to the person who doesn’t stand firm to the end?
By implication, he will not be saved.
There are other teachings that say the same thing:
Now, brothers, I want to remind you of the gospel I preached to you,
which you received and on which you have taken your stand. By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached
to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain (1 Corinthians 15:1-2).
Paul’s
warning is clear and unambiguous. These
are people who received his gospel. They
took their stand on it. And they
will be saved by it IF they hold firmly to what he preached to them.
Paul warns – not by implication but by direct statement – they
will be lost if they do not hold firmly to the word he preached to them.
Lest
we think this was a one-time warning, Paul also warned the Colossians:
Once you were
alienated from God and were enemies in your minds because of your evil behavior.
But now he has
reconciled you by Christ’s physical body through death to present you holy in
his sight, without blemish and free from accusation— if you continue in your faith, established and
firm, not moved from the hope held out in the gospel. This is the gospel
that you heard and that has been proclaimed to every creature under heaven, and
of which I, Paul, have become a servant (Colossians 1:21-23).
Paul
recites to the Colossians the glorious gospel and grace of God.
God reconciled us by Christ physical body through death.
His purpose was to present us holy in his sight, without blemish and free
from accusation! Hallelujah!
But that is qualified and true ONLY if we continue in our faith,
established and firm, not moved from the hope held out in the gospel.
Was
this also just an aberration on Paul’s part, something he threw out which
really did not represent his thinking and theology?
Just the opposite! He said
that gospel is what the Colossians heard (likely from him) and of which he had
become a servant. It was his
gospel, his theology, and his beautiful summary of the gospel.
The
writer to the Hebrews says something similar as he warns his readers:
You need to
persevere so that when you have done the will of God, you will receive what he
has promised. For in just a very little while, “He who is coming
will come and will not delay. But my righteous one will live by faith.
And if he shrinks back, I will not be pleased with him.” But we are not of those who shrink back and are
destroyed, but of those who believe and are saved (Hebrews 10:36-39).
The
writer is speaking to believers. He
warns they must persevere so they will receive what God has promised those who
persevere – his salvation. Then
he talks about those who don’t persevere, those who shrink back. He tells us what will happen to them – they are
destroyed!
Peter
also spoke to the issue of perseverance and those who fall away:
If they have escaped
the corruption of the world by knowing our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and
are again entangled in it and overcome, they are worse off at the end
than they were at the beginning. It would have been better for them not to have known the way of
righteousness, than to have known it and then to turn their backs on the sacred
command that was passed on to them (2 Peter 2:20-21).
These
people were saved. Peter says they
had escaped the corruption of the world by knowing our Lord and Savior Jesus
Christ. But they lapsed back
into the world and were again entangled in it and overcome.
What is their condition? They
are worse off than they were at the beginning.
What was their situation at the beginning?
They were bound for hell, as people who didn’t know.
Now, however, they knew the Lord Jesus, but turned their back on him and
went back into the world.
Jesus
corroborated Peter’s view of varying punishment when he warned,
“That servant
who knows his master’s will and does not get ready or does not do what his
master wants will be beaten with many blows. But the one who does not know and does things deserving punishment will be
beaten with few blows” (Luke 12:47-48).
Because
the people Peter spoke of knew the will of the Lord Jesus but did not do it
(stand firm to the end), they will be beaten with many blows. The
unbeliever who has never heard will be beaten with few blows.
Thus the people of whom Peter spoke were worse off at the end than they
were at the beginning.
When
Paul spoke to Timothy, his son in the Lord, he talked about people who had
fallen away. Paul reminded
Timothy why he was giving him further instructions, “so that by following them
you may fight the good fight, holding on to faith and a good conscience.
Some have rejected these and so
have shipwrecked their faith” (1
Timothy 1:18-19).
When
Paul enumerated to Timothy the requirements for overseers, he commanded:
“He must not be a recent convert, or he may become conceited and fall under the same judgment as the devil” (1 Timothy 3:6).
What will be the judgment of the devil?
Scripture clearly tells us that he will be thrown into the lake of fire
– known to us as hell. This passage states that the person is a recent convert,
someone who has entered into a saving relationship with the Lord.
But Paul warns about what may happen to him in the future.
He may become conceited and be lost!
His fate will be the same as the devil.
God will have erased his name from the book of life (Revelation 20:15).
Paul then warned Timothy about younger widows:
“As
for younger widows, do not put them on such a list. For when their sensual
desires overcome their dedication to Christ, they want to marry.
Thus they bring judgment on themselves, because they have broken their
first pledge. Besides, they get
into the habit of being idle and going about from house to house.
And not only do they become idlers, but also gossips and busybodies,
saying things they ought not to. So
I counsel younger widows to marry, to have children, to manage their homes and
to give the enemy no opportunity for slander.
Some have in fact already turned
away to follow Satan” (1 Timothy 5:11-15).
Paul does not suggest that these young widows were not once true Christians. He speaks of their dedication to Christ. But the desires of the flesh and bad habits can lead to a sinful life. Paul says he knows of instances where they left their dedication to Christ to follow Satan.
Is
it possible that a person when first coming to the Lord will pledge obedience to
him, but later cool in his ardor and fall away into disobedience? Of
course it is possible unless we all become robots incapable of independent
thought and lose our free will upon coming to the Lord. We
know that is not so. And most of us
know people who have fallen away from the faith.
There
are many scriptures that speak of the need for obedience to the will of God.
Jesus spoke of it at Matthew 7:21:
“Not everyone
who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only
he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.”
That
statement simply and clearly implies that those who do not do the will of God
will not enter the kingdom of heaven as only those who do God’s will shall
enter that kingdom. Even though a
person begins well, he does not do God’s will unless he perseveres in the
faith.
Paul
warns even more severely:
He will punish
those who do not know God and do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus.
They will be punished with everlasting destruction
and shut out from the presence of the Lord and from the majesty of his power (2 Thessalonians 1:8-9).
It
doesn’t get much clearer or more forceful than that!
Just
as we chose perseverance and obedience, so we could say the same about all those
conditions where Jesus said that unless we did that condition, we could not be
his disciples. I hope no one will
argue that anyone will have salvation who is not a disciple of the Lord Jesus.
Let’s
look at some examples:
26
“If anyone
comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children,
his brothers and sisters—yes, even his own life—he cannot be my
disciple” (Luke
14:26).
27
And anyone who
does not carry his cross and follow me cannot be my disciple” (Luke
14:27).
33
In the same way,
any of you who does not give up everything he has cannot be my
disciple” (Luke
14:33).
3
In reply Jesus
declared, “I tell you the truth, no one can see the kingdom of God unless he
is born again” (John 3:3).
20
For I tell you
that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the
teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 5:20).
We
are to love Jesus so much more than those closest to us, even our life, that by
contrast it is as though we hate those dearest to us. We are to carry our crosses and follow Jesus, to give up
everything, to be born again, and to be righteous from the heart.
Unless we do this, we cannot be Jesus’ disciple or see or enter
the kingdom of heaven.
Each
of the above scriptures exclude from salvation those who are not obedient to the
requirement of the scripture. Each
of those are part of our bargain with God when we receive Jesus as our Lord and
pledge obedience to him. We pledge
obedience to the teachings and commands of Jesus. We break our part of the bargain when we are disobedient.
As
we see from the preceding discussion, when we are disobedient to the teachings
and commands of Jesus, we are breaching our part of the bargain with God.
Does God instantly demand return of his Holy Spirit and cause us to be
damned? Thankfully, that is not the
way God reacts. “He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but
everyone to come to repentance” (2 Peter 3:9).
But
don’t presume upon his patience. In
the article “Can Sinning Cost Salvation,” there is far more than ample proof
that God will damn those who continue in sin.
Our duty, when we realize we have sinned (breached our bargain with God)
is to repent immediately. “If we
confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and
purify us from all unrighteousness” (1 John 1:9).
But
remember, we cannot sin with impunity and then confess our sins, believing we
can then be forgiven and purified before God.
The Apostle John warned, “No one who lives in him keeps on sinning.
No one who continues to sin has either seen him or known him” (1 John 3:6).
If you think you can sin with impunity and be forgiven, you do not live
in him nor have you ever seen him or known him.
A
more strident warning about future judgment and punishment is given from the
writer to the Hebrews:
If we
deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth,
no sacrifice for sins is left, but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will
consume the enemies of God
(Hebrews 10:26-27).
The
author of Hebrews considers those who deliberately keep on sinning to be enemies of God!
The
NIV rendering of “deposit guaranteeing our inheritance” is totally
erroneous. The choice of
“deposit” to replace “earnest” failed to pass through significant
meanings of “earnest”. And the
words “guaranteeing our inheritance” are nowhere to be found in the original
on any of the three texts. They
were added gratituitously by the translators.
They were in error in doing so. The
meanings of “earnest” do not support the use of that phrase.
We
have just seen the danger of following translations. I feel particularly sad because I have used the NIV for years
as my reading Bible of choice. When
I read and write, though, I try to make sure to compare the King James and other
versions with the NIV on important passages to be sure there is not a
significant difference in meaning. I
urge you to do the same!
Footnote:
[1] For a more complete discussion of what constitutes a saving faith, visit the website: www.bereanpublishers.co.nz , Book: Saving Faith, and Salvation Issues/Listening In.